Last checked

Trader Joe's allulose lawsuits · Last reviewed · Cross-checked sources

Alexander et al. v. Trader Joe's Company

A proposed class action challenging “No Sugar Added” claims on No Sugar Added Dark Chocolate Chips, 8 oz, as reported in reviewed sources. Filed September 16, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Where it stands

Complaint filed; no later outcome identified in reviewed sources

As of October 3, 2026. Basis: recent secondary report. This is the latest status supported by the public sources reviewed. It is not represented as a complete same-day PACER docket review.

Bought No Sugar Added Dark Chocolate Chips, 8 oz? Share your purchase with a law firm reviewing these claims.Share your purchase

How Franco applies here

By court

Binding

This case is in the Seventh Circuit, the court that decided Franco v. Chobani.

By rule: No Sugar Added, No Added Sugar

Not decided

The no-added-sugar rule, § 101.60(c)(2). Franco v. Chobani addressed the sugar-free rule, not this one. Rule cited: 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(2).

What the complaint challenges

According to reviewed sources, the complaint challenges “No Sugar Added” claims on No Sugar Added Dark Chocolate Chips, 8 oz. This is the wording as reported in those sources. It has not yet been checked against the complaint or the package itself.

Our record groups this as No Sugar Added and No Added Sugar. The related federal rule is 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(2). How these label claims differ.

Allegations are not findings of fact.

Timeline

Material events supported by sources. This is not a complete docket history.

  1. Complaint filed.

    Source: OpenClassActions (secondary source); All About Lawyer (secondary source)

What this case does not establish

  • The complaint’s allegations are claims, not findings of fact.
  • A proposed class is not a certified class. Classes certified: none identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
  • Court-approved settlements: none identified. Claim forms: none identified. Both in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
  • Being on this page does not mean any reader qualifies for compensation. There is no claims process to join through this site.

Separate dockets with their own courts and procedural histories. All Trader Joe's allulose lawsuits.

Filed after Franco

Verified Trader Joe's cases by filing date, July 27, 2026 to October 3, 2026. All three filed within 8 weeks of the ruling.

  1. Jul 27, 2026Franco v. Chobani: the Seventh Circuit reverses the dismissal
  2. Sep 16, 2026 · N.D. Ill.Alexander et al. v. Trader Joe's Company This caseFranco: binding
  3. Sep 16, 2026 · N.D. Ill.Parker et al. v. Trader Joe's Co.Franco: binding
  4. Sep 21, 2026 · S.D. Cal.Parr et al. v. Trader Joe's Co.Franco: persuasive
Source: Allulose Litigation case record, verified cases only. Month-only filing dates are shown as a span across the month. Last checked October 3, 2026.

2 cases, newest filing first

Other Trader Joe's cases
FiledCaseWording challengedCourtLatest supported status
Parr et al. v. Trader Joe's Co.No. 26-cv-5411“Zero Sugar”S.D. Cal.Reported pending
Parker et al. v. Trader Joe's Co.No. 1:26-cv-11360“0g Sugar”N.D. Ill.Reported pending

Background reading

Source record

Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.

Bought No Sugar Added Dark Chocolate Chips, 8 oz?

Six short questions. See where your product stands first, then choose whether a law firm reviewing these claims can contact you.

Share your purchase Get updates only

About 2 minutes · No receipt needed · Sharing is your choice