Joyride allulose lawsuits · Last reviewed · Cross-checked sources
Edwards v. Project 7, Inc.
A proposed class action challenging “Zero Sugar” and “Sugar Free” and “0 Sugar” claims on Joyride gummy candies, as reported in reviewed sources. Filed September 9, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Where it stands
Complaint filed; no later outcome identified in reviewed sources
As of October 3, 2026. Basis: public docket-index snapshot. This is the latest status supported by the public sources reviewed. It is not represented as a complete same-day PACER docket review.
Bought Joyride gummy candies? Share your purchase with a law firm reviewing these claims.Share your purchase
How Franco applies here
By court
Binding
This case is in the Seventh Circuit, the court that decided Franco v. Chobani.
By rule: Zero Sugar, Sugar Free, 0g Sugar
Addressed
The sugar-free rule, § 101.60(c)(1), which Franco v. Chobani addressed. Rule cited: 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.13, 101.60(c)(1).
What the complaint challenges
According to reviewed sources, the complaint challenges “Zero Sugar” and “Sugar Free” and “0 Sugar” claims on Joyride gummy candies. This is the wording as reported in those sources. It has not yet been checked against the complaint or the package itself.
Our record groups this as Zero Sugar and Sugar Free and 0g Sugar. The related federal rule is 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.13, 101.60(c)(1). How these label claims differ.
Allegations are not findings of fact.
Timeline
Material events supported by sources. This is not a complete docket history.
Complaint filed.
Source: Justia Dockets (court-derived docket index); ClaimDepot (secondary source)
What this case does not establish
- The complaint’s allegations are claims, not findings of fact.
- A proposed class is not a certified class. Classes certified: none identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- Court-approved settlements: none identified. Claim forms: none identified. Both in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- Being on this page does not mean any reader qualifies for compensation. There is no claims process to join through this site.
The Joyride cases
Separate dockets with their own courts and procedural histories. All Joyride allulose lawsuits.
Filed after Franco
Verified Joyride cases by filing date, July 27, 2026 to October 3, 2026. All two filed within 7 weeks of the ruling.
- Jul 27, 2026Franco v. Chobani: the Seventh Circuit reverses the dismissal
- Sep 9, 2026 · N.D. Ill.Edwards v. Project 7, Inc. This case
- Sep 11, 2026 · N.D. Cal.Switzer et al. v. Project 7, Inc.
1 case, newest filing first
| Filed | Case | Wording challenged | Court | Latest supported status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Switzer et al. v. Project 7, Inc.No. 26-cv-10282 | “Zero Sugar”“Sugar Free”“0 Sugar” | N.D. Cal. | Reported pending |
No cases match these filters. If you bought a product that isn’t here, you can still share your purchase.
Background reading
Source record
Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.
- Edwards v. Project 7, Inc.Court-derived docket index · Justia Dockets · Sep 9, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026
- Joyride class action alleges Zero Sugar candy is mostly sugarSecondary source · ClaimDepot · Sep 14, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026