Ray's / Sweet Baby Ray's allulose lawsuits · Last reviewed · Cross-checked sources
Rodriguez et al. v. Ken's Foods, LLC
A proposed class action challenging “No Sugar Added” claims on No Sugar Added sauces and marinades, as reported in reviewed sources. Filed September 3, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
Where it stands
Pending, as reported by a secondary tracker
As of October 3, 2026. Basis: recent secondary tracker report. This is the latest status supported by the public sources reviewed. It is not represented as a complete same-day PACER docket review.
Bought No Sugar Added sauces and marinades? Share your purchase with a law firm reviewing these claims.Share your purchase
How Franco applies here
By court
Persuasive
This case is in the First Circuit. Franco v. Chobani is a Seventh Circuit ruling, so it does not bind this court.
By rule: No Added Sugar, No Sugar Added
Not decided
The no-added-sugar rule, § 101.60(c)(2). Franco v. Chobani addressed the sugar-free rule, not this one. Rule cited: 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(2).
What the complaint challenges
According to reviewed sources, the complaint challenges “No Sugar Added” claims on No Sugar Added sauces and marinades. This is the wording as reported in those sources. It has not yet been checked against the complaint or the package itself.
Our record groups this as No Added Sugar and No Sugar Added. The related federal rule is 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(2). How these label claims differ.
Allegations are not findings of fact.
Timeline
Material events supported by sources. This is not a complete docket history.
Complaint filed.
Source: Truth in Advertising (secondary source); Justia Dockets (court-derived docket index)
What this case does not establish
- The complaint’s allegations are claims, not findings of fact.
- A proposed class is not a certified class. Classes certified: none identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- Court-approved settlements: none identified. Claim forms: none identified. Both in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- The pending status reflects a recent secondary tracker report. It is not a complete review of the current docket.
- Being on this page does not mean any reader qualifies for compensation. There is no claims process to join through this site.
The Ray's / Sweet Baby Ray's cases
Separate dockets with their own courts and procedural histories. All Ray's / Sweet Baby Ray's allulose lawsuits.
Filed after Franco
Verified Ray's / Sweet Baby Ray's cases by filing date, July 27, 2026 to October 3, 2026. All four filed within 7 weeks of the ruling.
- Jul 27, 2026Franco v. Chobani: the Seventh Circuit reverses the dismissal
- Sep 3, 2026 · D. Mass.Rodriguez et al. v. Ken's Foods, LLC This case
- Sep 8, 2026 · E.D.N.Y.Ross et al. v. Ken's Foods, LLC
- Sep 8, 2026 · D. Mass.Trapasso et al. v. Ken's Foods, LLC
- Sep 9, 2026 · N.D. Ill.Carter et al. v. Ken's Foods, LLC
3 cases, newest filing first
| Filed | Case | Wording challenged | Court | Latest supported status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carter et al. v. Ken's Foods, LLCNo. 1:26-cv-10941 | “No Sugar Added” | N.D. Ill. | Reported pending | |
| Ross et al. v. Ken's Foods, LLCNo. 2:26-cv-05538 | “No Sugar Added” | E.D.N.Y. | Reported pending | |
| Trapasso et al. v. Ken's Foods, LLCNo. 1:26-cv-14120 | “No Sugar Added” | D. Mass. | Reported pending |
No cases match these filters. If you bought a product that isn’t here, you can still share your purchase.
Background reading
Source record
Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.
- Rodriguez v. Kens Foods, LLCCourt-derived docket index · Justia Dockets · Sep 3, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026
- Ray's Sauces and MarinadesSecondary source · Truth in Advertising · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026