Conagra allulose lawsuits · Last reviewed · Cross-checked sources
Sanderson v. Conagra Brands, Inc.
A proposed class action challenging “No Added Sugar” claims on Keto baking products marketed as having no added sugar, as reported in reviewed sources. Filed September 17, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Where it stands
Complaint filed; no later outcome identified in reviewed sources
As of October 3, 2026. Basis: public docket-index snapshot. This is the latest status supported by the public sources reviewed. It is not represented as a complete same-day PACER docket review.
Bought Keto baking products marketed as having no added sugar? Share your purchase with a law firm reviewing these claims.Share your purchase
How Franco applies here
By court
Binding
This case is in the Seventh Circuit, the court that decided Franco v. Chobani.
By rule: No Added Sugar
Not decided
The no-added-sugar rule, § 101.60(c)(2). Franco v. Chobani addressed the sugar-free rule, not this one. Rule cited: 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(2).
What the complaint challenges
According to reviewed sources, the complaint challenges “No Added Sugar” claims on Keto baking products marketed as having no added sugar. This is the wording as reported in those sources. It has not yet been checked against the complaint or the package itself.
Our record groups this as No Added Sugar. The related federal rule is 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(2). How these label claims differ.
Allegations are not findings of fact.
Timeline
Material events supported by sources. This is not a complete docket history.
Complaint filed.
Source: Law360 (court-derived docket index); Justia Dockets (court-derived docket index)
What this case does not establish
- The complaint’s allegations are claims, not findings of fact.
- A proposed class is not a certified class. Classes certified: none identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- Court-approved settlements: none identified. Claim forms: none identified. Both in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- Being on this page does not mean any reader qualifies for compensation. There is no claims process to join through this site.
Background reading
Source record
Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.
- Sanderson v. Conagra Brands, Inc.Court-derived docket index · Law360 · Sep 17, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026
- Sanderson v. Conagra Brands, Inc.Court-derived docket index · Justia Dockets · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026