Hormbles Chormbles allulose lawsuits · Last reviewed · Cross-checked sources
Torres et al. v. Chicago Candy Co., Inc. d/b/a Hormbles Chormbles
A proposed class action challenging “0g Sugar” claims on Hormbles Chormbles Protein Candy, as reported in reviewed sources. Filed September 24, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
Where it stands
Pending, as reported by a secondary tracker
As of October 3, 2026. Basis: recent secondary tracker report. A current secondary tracker reports the case pending. This is not a substitute for a complete same-day PACER docket.
Bought Hormbles Chormbles Protein Candy? Share your purchase with a law firm reviewing these claims.Share your purchase
How Franco applies here
By court
Binding
This case is in the Seventh Circuit, the court that decided Franco v. Chobani.
By rule: 0g Sugar
Addressed
The sugar-free rule, § 101.60(c)(1), which Franco v. Chobani addressed. Rule cited: 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.13, 101.60(c)(1).
What the complaint challenges
According to reviewed sources, the complaint challenges “0g Sugar” claims on Hormbles Chormbles Protein Candy. This is the wording as reported in those sources. It has not yet been checked against the complaint or the package itself.
Our record groups this as 0g Sugar. The related federal rule is 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.13, 101.60(c)(1). How these label claims differ.
Allegations are not findings of fact.
Timeline
Material events supported by sources. This is not a complete docket history.
Complaint filed.
Source: Truth in Advertising (secondary source); Justia Dockets (court-derived docket index)
What this case does not establish
- The complaint’s allegations are claims, not findings of fact.
- A proposed class is not a certified class. Classes certified: none identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- Court-approved settlements: none identified. Claim forms: none identified. Both in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- The pending status reflects a recent secondary tracker report. It is not a complete review of the current docket.
- Being on this page does not mean any reader qualifies for compensation. There is no claims process to join through this site.
Background reading
Source record
Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.
- Torres v. Chicago Candy Company, Inc.Court-derived docket index · Justia Dockets · Sep 24, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026
- Hormbles Chormbles Protein CandySecondary source · Truth in Advertising · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026