Nick's allulose lawsuits · Last reviewed · Cross-checked sources
Trapasso et al. v. Luthman Backlund Foods USA Inc.
A proposed class action challenging “No Added Sugar” claims on Nick's Light Ice Cream, as reported in reviewed sources. Filed September 3, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
Where it stands
Pending, as reported by a secondary tracker
As of October 3, 2026. Basis: recent secondary tracker report. A current secondary tracker reports the case pending. This is not a substitute for a complete same-day PACER docket.
Bought Nick's Light Ice Cream? Share your purchase with a law firm reviewing these claims.Share your purchase
How Franco applies here
By court
Persuasive
This case is in the Third Circuit. Franco v. Chobani is a Seventh Circuit ruling, so it does not bind this court.
By rule: No Added Sugar
Not decided
The no-added-sugar rule, § 101.60(c)(2). Franco v. Chobani addressed the sugar-free rule, not this one. Rule cited: 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(2).
What the complaint challenges
According to reviewed sources, the complaint challenges “No Added Sugar” claims on Nick's Light Ice Cream. This is the wording as reported in those sources. It has not yet been checked against the complaint or the package itself.
Our record groups this as No Added Sugar. The related federal rule is 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(2). How these label claims differ.
Allegations are not findings of fact.
Timeline
Material events supported by sources. This is not a complete docket history.
Complaint filed.
Source: Truth in Advertising (secondary source); Justia Dockets (court-derived docket index)
What this case does not establish
- The complaint’s allegations are claims, not findings of fact.
- A proposed class is not a certified class. Classes certified: none identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- Court-approved settlements: none identified. Claim forms: none identified. Both in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- The pending status reflects a recent secondary tracker report. It is not a complete review of the current docket.
- Being on this page does not mean any reader qualifies for compensation. There is no claims process to join through this site.
The Nick's cases
Separate dockets with their own courts and procedural histories. All Nick's allulose lawsuits.
Filed after Franco
Verified Nick's cases by filing date, July 27, 2026 to October 3, 2026. All two filed within 7 weeks of the ruling.
- Jul 27, 2026Franco v. Chobani: the Seventh Circuit reverses the dismissal
- Sep 3, 2026 · D. Del.Trapasso et al. v. Luthman Backlund Foods USA Inc. This case
- Sep 11, 2026 · E.D. Cal.Avalos et al. v. Luthman Backlund Foods USA Inc.
1 case, newest filing first
| Filed | Case | Wording challenged | Court | Latest supported status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avalos et al. v. Luthman Backlund Foods USA Inc.No. 26-cv-3137 | “No Added Sugar” | E.D. Cal. | Reported pending |
No cases match these filters. If you bought a product that isn’t here, you can still share your purchase.
Background reading
Source record
Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.
- Trapasso v. Luthman Backlund Foods USA Inc.Court-derived docket index · Justia Dockets · Sep 3, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026
- Nick's Light Ice CreamSecondary source · Truth in Advertising · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026