Last checked
Allulose Litigation
Share your purchase

BODYARMOR allulose lawsuits · Last reviewed · Primary-source support

Walsh v. BA Sports Nutrition, LLC

A proposed class action challenging “Zero Sugar” claims on BODYARMOR Flash I.V. Zero Sugar, as reported in reviewed sources. Filed September 14, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Where it stands

Pending, as reported by a secondary tracker

As of October 3, 2026. Basis: recent secondary tracker report. This is the latest status supported by the public sources reviewed. It is not represented as a complete same-day PACER docket review.

Bought BODYARMOR Flash I.V. Zero Sugar? Share your purchase with a law firm reviewing these claims.Share your purchase

How Franco applies here

By court

Persuasive

This case is in the Ninth Circuit. Franco v. Chobani is a Seventh Circuit ruling, so it does not bind this court.

By rule: Zero Sugar

Addressed

The sugar-free rule, § 101.60(c)(1), which Franco v. Chobani addressed. Rule cited: 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(1).

Franco v. Chobani: the appellate ruling and its limits

What the complaint challenges

According to reviewed sources, the complaint challenges “Zero Sugar” claims on BODYARMOR Flash I.V. Zero Sugar. This is the wording as reported in those sources. It has not yet been checked against the complaint or the package itself.

Our record groups this as Zero Sugar. The related federal rule is 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(1). How these label claims differ.

Allegations are not findings of fact.

Timeline

Material events supported by sources. This is not a complete docket history.

  1. Complaint filed.

    Source: U.S. District Court filing, mirror hosted by OpenClassActions (primary source); OpenClassActions (secondary source); Truth in Advertising (secondary source)

What this case does not establish

  • The complaint’s allegations are claims, not findings of fact.
  • A proposed class is not a certified class. Classes certified: none identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
  • Court-approved settlements: none identified. Claim forms: none identified. Both in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
  • The pending status reflects a recent secondary tracker report. It is not a complete review of the current docket.
  • Being on this page does not mean any reader qualifies for compensation. There is no claims process to join through this site.

Background reading

Source record

Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.

Bought BODYARMOR Flash I.V. Zero Sugar?

Six short questions. See where your product stands first, then choose whether a law firm reviewing these claims can contact you.

Share your purchase Get updates only

About 2 minutes · No receipt needed · Sharing is your choice