DAVID Protein allulose lawsuits · Last reviewed · Cross-checked sources
Yovino et al. v. Linus Technology MergerSub, LLC
A proposed class action challenging “0g Sugar” claims on DAVID Protein Bars, as reported in reviewed sources. Filed August 24, 2026 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Where it stands
Pending, as reported by a secondary tracker
As of October 3, 2026. Basis: recent secondary tracker report. A current secondary tracker reports the case pending. This is not a substitute for a complete same-day PACER docket.
Bought DAVID Protein Bars? Share your purchase with a law firm reviewing these claims.Share your purchase
How Franco applies here
By court
Persuasive
This case is in the Ninth Circuit. Franco v. Chobani is a Seventh Circuit ruling, so it does not bind this court.
By rule: 0g Sugar
Addressed
The sugar-free rule, § 101.60(c)(1), which Franco v. Chobani addressed. Rule cited: 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.13, 101.60(c)(1).
What the complaint challenges
According to reviewed sources, the complaint challenges “0g Sugar” claims on DAVID Protein Bars. This is the wording as reported in those sources. It has not yet been checked against the complaint or the package itself.
Our record groups this as 0g Sugar. The related federal rule is 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.13, 101.60(c)(1). How these label claims differ.
Allegations are not findings of fact.
Timeline
Material events supported by sources. This is not a complete docket history.
Complaint filed.
Source: Truth in Advertising (secondary source); Juris Law Group (secondary source)
What this case does not establish
- The complaint’s allegations are claims, not findings of fact.
- A proposed class is not a certified class. Classes certified: none identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- Court-approved settlements: none identified. Claim forms: none identified. Both in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
- The pending status reflects a recent secondary tracker report. It is not a complete review of the current docket.
- Being on this page does not mean any reader qualifies for compensation. There is no claims process to join through this site.
The DAVID Protein cases
Separate dockets with their own courts and procedural histories. All DAVID Protein allulose lawsuits.
Filed after Franco
Verified DAVID Protein cases by filing date, July 27, 2026 to October 3, 2026. All three filed within 7 weeks of the ruling.
- Jul 27, 2026Franco v. Chobani: the Seventh Circuit reverses the dismissal
- Aug 24, 2026 · N.D. Cal.Yovino et al. v. Linus Technology MergerSub, LLC This case
- Sep 4, 2026 · C.D. Cal.McCarthy et al. v. Linus Technology MergerSub, LLC
- Sep 10, 2026 · M.D. Fla.Dash et al. v. Linus Technology, Inc.
2 cases, newest filing first
| Filed | Case | Wording challenged | Court | Latest supported status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dash et al. v. Linus Technology, Inc.No. 5:26-cv-00646 | “0g Sugar” | M.D. Fla. | Reported pending | |
| McCarthy et al. v. Linus Technology MergerSub, LLCNo. 2:26-cv-09958 | “0g Sugar” | C.D. Cal. | Reported pending |
No cases match these filters. If you bought a product that isn’t here, you can still share your purchase.
Background reading
Source record
Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.
- DAVID 0g Sugar Protein BarsSecondary source · Truth in Advertising · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026
- Class Actions Lawsuits Newsletter - August 2026Secondary source · Juris Law Group · August 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026