Brand coverage · Last reviewed
Goli allulose lawsuits
The short answer
- One verified proposed class action challenges “Zero Sugar” claims on Goli Zero Sugar gummies.
- Rule in play: 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(1) (the sugar-free rule, which Franco addressed).
- None of these cases is in the Seventh Circuit, so Franco v. Chobani is persuasive authority only.
- No liability finding, class certification or court-approved settlement has been identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
Goli at a glance
- Verified cases
- 1
- Federal districts
- 1
- Circuits
- 1
- Classes certified*
- None identified
- Settlements*
- None identified
Latest filing September 1, 2026. * In the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026; not a complete same-day docket review. Settlement status explained
This page is built from the structured case record. A full editorial guide to the Goli cases has not been published yet. Allegations are not findings of fact.
The Goli cases we track
Filed after Franco
Verified Goli cases by filing date, July 27, 2026 to October 3, 2026. Filed within 6 weeks of the ruling.
- Jul 27, 2026Franco v. Chobani: the Seventh Circuit reverses the dismissal
- Sep 1, 2026 · C.D. Cal.Mercado v. Goli Nutrition Inc.
1 case, newest filing first
| Filed | Case | Wording challenged | Court | Franco is | Latest supported status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercado v. Goli Nutrition Inc.No. 2:26-cv-09807 | “Zero Sugar” | C.D. Cal. | Persuasive | Complaint filed |
No cases match these filters. If you bought a product that isn’t here, you can still share your purchase.
Open the Goli cases in the case tracker
Records reviewed through October 3, 2026. Verified totals include only supported core labeling cases. Sources and methodology.
The rule in play
The federal rule treats “sugar free” and “no added sugar” claims under separate subsections. Claim families below come from our case record; they group reported allegations.
21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(1)
Zero Sugar
Addressed in Franco: The sugar-free rule, § 101.60(c)(1), which Franco v. Chobani addressed.
Franco v. Chobani held that allulose falls within the federal definition of sugar for the regulation it interpreted. It did not decide liability, and its binding effect is limited to the Seventh Circuit.
Goli: product groups
Goli Zero Sugar gummies
“Zero Sugar”
Product groups summarize allegations in the reviewed cases. A listed product does not establish class membership, payment eligibility, or that every flavor or variant is challenged.
Sources for this module
- Mercado v. Goli Nutrition Inc. Class Action Complaint (Primary source)
- Goli Nutrition class action over Zero Sugar gummies and allulose (Secondary source)
Goli: status in reviewed records
Mercado v. Goli Nutrition Inc.
Complaint filed; no later outcome identified in reviewed sources
Older public docket-index snapshot. Checked October 3, 2026. This is the latest status supported by the public sources reviewed. It is not represented as a complete same-day PACER docket review.
Public docket indexes and secondary tracker reports do not establish the contents of the complete current court docket.
Sources for this module
- Mercado v. Goli Nutrition Inc. Class Action Complaint (Primary source)
- Goli Nutrition class action over Zero Sugar gummies and allulose (Secondary source)
Settlement and claims-process review
The reviewed sources do not represent a complete same-day PACER review of every docket. A proposed class is not a certified class, and dismissal alone does not establish a settlement.
Background reading
Source record
Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.
Show all 2 sources
- Mercado v. Goli Nutrition Inc. Class Action ComplaintPrimary source · U.S. District Court filing, mirror hosted by Labels Matter · Sep 1, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026
- Goli Nutrition class action over Zero Sugar gummies and alluloseSecondary source · Labels Matter · Sep 6, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026