Brand coverage · Last reviewed
HighKey allulose lawsuits
The short answer
- One verified proposed class action challenges “0g Sugar” claims on HighKey Original Sandwich Cookies.
- Rule in play: 21 C.F.R. §§ 101.13, 101.60(c)(1) (the sugar-free rule, which Franco addressed).
- None of these cases is in the Seventh Circuit, so Franco v. Chobani is persuasive authority only.
- No liability finding, class certification or court-approved settlement has been identified in the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026.
HighKey at a glance
- Verified cases
- 1
- Federal districts
- 1
- Circuits
- 1
- Classes certified*
- None identified
- Settlements*
- None identified
Latest filing September 18, 2026. * In the records reviewed as of October 3, 2026; not a complete same-day docket review. Settlement status explained
This page is built from the structured case record. A full editorial guide to the HighKey cases has not been published yet. Allegations are not findings of fact.
The HighKey cases we track
Filed after Franco
Verified HighKey cases by filing date, July 27, 2026 to October 3, 2026. Filed within 8 weeks of the ruling.
- Jul 27, 2026Franco v. Chobani: the Seventh Circuit reverses the dismissal
- Sep 18, 2026 · S.D.N.Y.Murray et al. v. Creation Foods US Inc.
1 case, newest filing first
| Filed | Case | Wording challenged | Court | Franco is | Latest supported status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murray et al. v. Creation Foods US Inc.No. 26-cv-8169 | “0g Sugar” | S.D.N.Y. | Persuasive | Complaint filed |
No cases match these filters. If you bought a product that isn’t here, you can still share your purchase.
Open the HighKey cases in the case tracker
Records reviewed through October 3, 2026. Verified totals include only supported core labeling cases. Sources and methodology.
The rule in play
The federal rule treats “sugar free” and “no added sugar” claims under separate subsections. Claim families below come from our case record; they group reported allegations.
21 C.F.R. §§ 101.13, 101.60(c)(1)
0g Sugar
Addressed in Franco: The sugar-free rule, § 101.60(c)(1), which Franco v. Chobani addressed.
Franco v. Chobani held that allulose falls within the federal definition of sugar for the regulation it interpreted. It did not decide liability, and its binding effect is limited to the Seventh Circuit.
HighKey: product groups
HighKey Original Sandwich Cookies
“0g Sugar”
Product groups summarize allegations in the reviewed cases. A listed product does not establish class membership, payment eligibility, or that every flavor or variant is challenged.
Sources for this module
- HighKey Original Sandwich Cookies (Secondary source)
- Murray et al. v. Creation Foods US Inc. (Court-derived docket index)
HighKey: status in reviewed records
Murray et al. v. Creation Foods US Inc.
No later outcome identified in reviewed sources
Public status review incomplete. Checked October 3, 2026. No sufficiently current public procedural source was located in this pass. Do not describe this as a same-day current docket status.
Public docket indexes and secondary tracker reports do not establish the contents of the complete current court docket.
Sources for this module
- HighKey Original Sandwich Cookies (Secondary source)
- Murray et al. v. Creation Foods US Inc. (Court-derived docket index)
Settlement and claims-process review
The reviewed sources do not represent a complete same-day PACER review of every docket. A proposed class is not a certified class, and dismissal alone does not establish a settlement.
Background reading
Source record
Primary and court-derived sources are listed first. Secondary reporting is used for discovery and cross-checking.
Show all 2 sources
- Murray et al. v. Creation Foods US Inc.Court-derived docket index · Justia Dockets · Sep 18, 2026 · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026
- HighKey Original Sandwich CookiesSecondary source · Truth in Advertising · Reviewed Oct 3, 2026